Why Online Learning is Not the Future of Education

Why Online Learning is Not the Future of Education

Most students and faculty don’t like online classes. They don’t want to make the switch permanent and faculty who teach online want to return to traditional classrooms. But online teaching has its place, too. While online teaching is convenient for some students, it poses a number of health risks. For example, COVID-19 is a threat to the health of college students and faculty. In the face of this challenge, online learning is the only solution.

Lack of regulation

According to Yu (2016), lack of regulation is not the future of online learning. In developing countries, the main constraint to online learning is access to the internet. This, in turn, hampers the use of online resources. Moreover, Mpungose argues that the power to regulate online resources lies with university management, not students. According to him, a lack of regulation in online learning could lead to technostress.

Many countries have federal data protection agencies. However, the United States is one of the few democracies without a federal data protection agency. The absence of such an agency could pose a risk to distance learners and online businesses. It is therefore crucial to read the terms of service of websites, opt out when possible, and limit the amount of information exchanged with third parties. But such regulation does not mean that online learners are at risk.

Besides the concerns regarding e-learning, another reason for students to choose online courses is pandemic diseases. For example, COVID-19, a new strain of virus discovered in 2019, causes not only a cold, but also deadly diseases. Because it can be passed from animals to humans, COVID-19 has the potential to affect human health, even to the point of death. It causes respiratory symptoms, fever, and shortness of breath, and has been linked to more than 300 deaths worldwide. This has raised concerns about the future of e-learning in such countries.

Although it might be tempting to conclude that

lack of regulation is the future of online learning, there is no evidence to support this theory. The future of online learning lies in ensuring that students are better prepared for the challenges ahead. It will help reduce the cost of high-quality learning opportunities while improving the quality of education. However, many students with low academic backgrounds and risk factors are not well-suited to fully online courses. The absence of personal interaction creates larger socioeconomic gaps.

Lack of accreditation

The current situation is very different from the past. Today, students and professors of all higher educational institutions are moving to the internet to complete their education. Many universities have made the shift to online learning, and some are even putting their entire course offerings online. This means that the future of education is very bright for online students. However, there are still some issues with online learning. Fortunately, there are now several ways to ensure that you’re getting the best education for your money.

The issue of lack of accreditation in online learning has many factors. While some institutions may have adopted e-classrooms, it’s important to remember that the current system of higher education is still in need of quality control and regulation. Furthermore, online learning has international dimensions. Historically, it has been difficult to get cross-border degree or credit accreditation. Currently, most countries are working to adopt this model on a massive scale.

The benefits of online learning include a wide range of certificate programs and advanced training opportunities. You can improve your skill set in a specific field, prepare for a future job, or pursue a graduate degree. Online education is an excellent way to enhance your existing skills or advance your education for an even greater future. So, the future of education is bright – don’t let the lack of accreditation turn you off!

Online education has also been a great source of convenience.

It allows you to learn wherever you are and whenever you want. Unlike traditional classrooms, online courses can be accessed at any time and can be reviewed at any time. But some argue that online education is not inferior to classroom-based education. Online lessons can also offer more personalized interaction between teachers and students. For those who have concerns, it’s a good thing that the government recognizes the value of online education and will ensure that online education is not a flop in the future.

Online education can also be a great opportunity for people with less financial resources. Many less-resourced students cannot afford to buy the technology necessary for college. They must use borrowed devices or work in locations that have Wi-Fi. While online education has the potential to reduce these disadvantages, it’s important to recognize that every student needs a computer and reliable internet connection to do their work. The responsibility of supplying reliable internet and computers to students is also a duty for well-resourced schools.

Lack of quality control

A lack of quality control in online learning can be attributed to several factors. While synchronous online courses are highly interactive, they are often lacking quality assurance. In addition to content, online learning programs often fail to meet accessibility and usability standards. In many cases, instructors have little control over the content they post and lack quality assurance, which can make it difficult to track course quality. The problem is even worse in the case of emergency online courses.

A quality assurance (QA) programme should also be in place for all courses offered in an online environment. This is because of the many pressures that stakeholders apply to online institutions. Typically, QA programmes include peer review and utilization review procedures. The goal of such processes is to identify quality deficiencies and develop remedial measures to improve the course’s quality. It is essential for online institutions to assess the content, design, and delivery of courses to meet national and international standards.

The OUT organization has a robust structure that embeds

quality assurance from the start. The University’s Senate, the supreme academic decision-making body, oversees QA. Boards of faculty and institutes also have oversight of quality assurance and are accountable to the Senate. The university’s charter of incorporation and rules outlines OUT’s governance structure. Further, OUT aims to improve student satisfaction through continuous improvement.

In some cases, the lack of quality assurance in ODL institutions has been due to the fact that these institutions have not properly documented their quality assurance policies. During the early stages of their establishment, ODL institutions may have focused on capacity building, designing systems, and implementing processes without paying attention to quality. During this time, the institution has been able to improve its quality assurance processes, forming operational procedures that have been refined through experience.

Lack of access

The future of online learning may depend on how quickly schools and institutions adjust to the changing educational environment. Lack of access to a computer and a network can prevent students from completing a course, whether it is for logistical or economic reasons. This is an especially major problem in lower socioeconomic communities and rural areas. Even if an institution does have high-speed internet, it is not available to everyone. Some pay a monthly rate, while others are charged for the time they spend on the Internet.

The COVID-19 virus was classified as a pandemic in March 2020, and it affected nearly a quarter billion people. Almost two months later, schools in Jordan were closed due to the outbreak, forcing them to use virtual learning. As a result, many vulnerable students were left behind and were forced to turn to online learning. The National Bureau of Economic Research published a working paper on the economic and social implications of lack of access to online learning. The authors emphasized the inequalities and dire consequences of not addressing these gaps. While the gaps were less significant in districts with higher in-person schooling, it is still a problem for low-income students.

The study examined the perceptions of both students

instructors regarding online learning. It surveyed 280 students and 50 faculty members randomly, allowing researchers to determine how students and instructors view the new medium. The study employed two online surveys, which were sent to the study population via social media. The study period was from September 15 to November 15 and involved 35 male faculty members and 15 female students. These results indicate that the future of education cannot be predicted without understanding the drawbacks of online learning.

The online environment is much less pressured than the traditional classroom environment, so students are more self-motivated. It is also much more time-consuming, as online courses require students to work independently and in their own time, which may be a factor in preventing them from getting a good education. However, students and faculty agree on the advantages and drawbacks of online learning. If you’re in Jordan, you should take the necessary precautions to avoid these problems.

Leave a Comment